Real property with a value of $68,000 was devised to the taxpayer (conditional upon settlement of the estate) "as a token of gratitude for the services" the taxpayer was called upon to perform under the will as liquidator of the estate. The taxpayer accepted his appointment as liquidator. Tardif J. found that the value of the property was remuneration from an office. The fact that the compensation was generous relative to the level of work performed did not alter this finding.
Topics and taglines
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
337284
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Boisvert v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2011 DTC 1296 [at 1670], 2011 TCC 290",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Boisvert v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2011 DTC 1296 [at 1670], 2011 TCC 290",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}