The "research" the taxpayer contracted for with a Brazilian firm did not qualify as scientific research & experimental development under s. 248(1): it was not scientifically noteworthy, considering such factors as the lack of a novel scientific question, and the lack of rigour in the hypotheses, experiments, and records.
Topics and taglines
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
337858
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Beaudry v. Her Majesty the Queen</em></strong>, 2008 TCC 17, 2010 DTC 1266 [at 3853] aff'd <a href=\"#Romar\"><em>Romar v. The Queen</em></a>, 2010 DTC 5076 [at 6816], 2009 FCA 48",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": ""
}
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Beaudry v. Her Majesty the Queen</em></strong>, 2008 TCC 17, 2010 DTC 1266 [at 3853] aff'd <a href=\"#Romar\"><em>Romar v. The Queen</em></a>, 2010 DTC 5076 [at 6816], 2009 FCA 48",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": ""
}