Sears Canada Inc. v. The Queen, 89 DTC 5039, [1989] 1 CTC 128 (FCA) -- summary under Paragraph 12(1)(e)

By services, 28 November, 2015

The amount of a s. 20(1)(m) reserve which RC had allowed as a deduction in computing the taxpayer's income in 1975 (a year not subject to appeal) was required to be added back in 1976 notwithstanding that the 1975 deduction was contrary to law. Mahoney JA stated (at p. 5039):

[T]he obligation to add back the 1975 reserve depends entirely on the fact that it had been claimed and allowed, the legality thereof being immaterial.

Topics and taglines
Tagline
inclusion of deduction taken contrary to law
Words and phrases
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
333732
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em><a id=\"Sears\"></a>Sears Canada Inc. v. The Queen</em></strong>, 89 DTC 5039 (FCA) <strong>[inclusion of deduction taken contrary to law]</strong>",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": ""
}
Workflow properties
Workflow state