After reviewing the authorities suggesting that the persuasion or indoctrination of people is not an activity in support of a charitable object, Stone J.A. indicated (at p. 5250) that "despite the object stated in the appellant's constituting documents its true mission is more likely that of advocating its strongly held convictions on important social and moral issues in a one-sided manner to the virtual exclusion of any equally strong opposing convictions", and dismissed an appeal against revocation of the appellant's status as a registered charity.
The procedures followed by Revenue Canada also had events to procedural fairness.