Marceau J.A. stated (at pp. 6603-4) that "the argument of counsel for the applicants, which in a nutshell would insert the adjective 'absolute' before the word 'discretion' ... so that the slightest general earmarking of a support payment would mean that it could no longer be characterized as a taxable allowance, is untenable ..."
Topics and taglines
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
338253
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Serra v. The Queen</em></strong>, 98 DTC 6602, Docket: A-619-97 (FCA)",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": ""
}
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Serra v. The Queen</em></strong>, 98 DTC 6602, Docket: A-619-97 (FCA)",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": ""
}