Manac Inc. Corp. v. Canada, 98 DTC 6605, [1998] 4 CTC 60 (FCA) -- summary under Subparagraph 111(5)(a)(ii)

By services, 28 November, 2015

All the voting shares of a corporation ("Nortex") which manufactured resin-coated wood panels, were acquired by a subsidiary of a predecessor of the taxpayer ("2432"). Nortex was then wound-up into 2432, and 2432 amalgamated with the predecessor of the taxpayer.

Nortex's former business of manufacturing fibreglass panels for sale to 2432 which used the panels in the manufacture of boxes for trailers and semi-trailers did not satisfy the test in s. 111(5)(a)(ii) given that there was no evidence that income derived from the sale or development of the panels made up substantially all the income attributable to the 2432 business. In addition, the Court did "not see how property which loses its identity when incorporated into an end product can be described as property similar to the end product" (p. 6608).

Topics and taglines
Tagline
panel component of trailer was not a similar property to the trailer
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
333459
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Manac Inc. v. The Queen</em></strong>, 98 DTC 6605, Docket: A-122-96 (FCA)",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": ""
}