After noting that the ambiguity which the Tax Court judge had found in s. 56(1)(v) was based entirely on Interpretation Bulletin IT-220R2, Noël J.A. stated (at p. 7147) that "the Act itself reflects no such ambiguity and the Bulletin, being a non-statutory document, cannot create an ambiguity where none exists in the relevant provisions of the Act."
Topics and taglines
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
340228
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>The Queen v. Whitney</em></strong>, 2002 DTC 7145, 2002 FCA 266",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": ""
}
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>The Queen v. Whitney</em></strong>, 2002 DTC 7145, 2002 FCA 266",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": ""
}