The taxpayer overlooked making an election in "prescribed form" under a comparable provision of the Corporations Tax Act (Ontario), and the Minister accepted the taxpayer's tax returns as if the interest expenditures had been properly capitalized pursuant to a formal election. It was stated (at p.393), that the Minister was entitled to waive the statutory requirement for the making of an election, and that the taxpayer accordingly was later precluded from arguing that it was entitled to deduct the capitalized interest as an expense. [C.R.: 85(1)]
Note
rev'd on other grounds [1984] CTC 566 (Ont CA), which was aff'd by [1988] 2 CTC 294, [1988] 2 S.C.R. 175
Topics and taglines
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
336235
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Mattabi Mines Ltd. v. Min. of Rev.</em></strong>, [1982] CTC 382 (SCO) reversed on other grounds [1984] CTC 566 (Ont CA), which was affirmed by [1988] 2 CTC 294, [1988] 2 S.C.R. 175",
"field_override_history": true,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Mattabi Mines Ltd. v. Min. of Rev.</em></strong>, [1982] CTC 382 (SCO) reversed on other grounds [1984] CTC 566 (Ont CA), which was affirmed by [1988] 2 CTC 294, [1988] 2 S.C.R. 175",
"field_override_history": true,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}