The 2004 amendment to s. 222(4)(a)(ii) was effective to overrule Markevich v. The Queen, so that tax debts that became prescribed due to a limitation period prior to the adoption of Bill C30 nonetheless could be enforced by the CCRA under the Act.
Topics and taglines
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
336410
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Collins v. CCRA</em></strong>, 2005 FC 1431",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": ""
}
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Collins v. CCRA</em></strong>, 2005 FC 1431",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": ""
}