The wholly-owned U.S. subsidiary of the taxpayer accumulated a large balance owing to the taxpayer as a result of its purchase of paint inventory over the years. In the taxation year in question, the subsidiary was in financial difficulty. MacArthur J. found that the taxpayer had shown that the "liquidation" method (under which an allowance for doubtful accounts was deducted equal to the difference between the amount owing and the net realizable value of the subsidiary's assets) was a reasonable method for computing the allowance, and that the burden then shifted to the Crown, who failed to provide any evidence as to why the liquidation approach was not acceptable.
Topics and taglines
Topic
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
332913
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Cloverdale Paint Inc. v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2007 DTC 243, 2006 TCC 628",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Cloverdale Paint Inc. v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2007 DTC 243, 2006 TCC 628",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}