The Minister made what was subsequently held to be an unconstitutional seizure pursuant to the former s. 231(1)(d) and was ordered to return the seized documents. The admission of some of this evidence to support a fresh application for a warrant pursuant to s. 231.3 would not bring the administration of justice into disrepute.
Topics and taglines
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
331915
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>The Queen v. F.K. Clayton Group Ltd.</em></strong>, 89 DTC 5417 (S.C.O.)",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": ""
}
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>The Queen v. F.K. Clayton Group Ltd.</em></strong>, 89 DTC 5417 (S.C.O.)",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": ""
}