Money that was found by the Tax Court judge to have been paid by the taxpayer to his daughter rather than to his ex-spouse and over which, moreover, the ex-spouse had no discretion as to its use, did not qualify as a support amount.
Topics and taglines
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
338309
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Ofori-Nimako v. Attorney General of Canada</em></strong>, 2005 DTC 5264, 2005 FCA 195",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": ""
}
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Ofori-Nimako v. Attorney General of Canada</em></strong>, 2005 DTC 5264, 2005 FCA 195",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": ""
}