Sharlow J.A. reversed a finding of the Tax Court that the words 'as recorded by a pharmacist' in s. 118.2(2)(n) could be ignored stating (at p. 6031) that "it is for Parliament alone to determine whether the words 'as recorded by a pharmacist' should be removed ... ."
Topics and taglines
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
340387
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>The Queen v. Ray</em></strong>, 2004 DTC 6028, 2004 FCA 1",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": ""
}
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>The Queen v. Ray</em></strong>, 2004 DTC 6028, 2004 FCA 1",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": ""
}