The proper interpretation of the agency agreement between the taxpayer, a Canadian-resident corporation, and its Puerto Rican subsidiary, was that the subsidiary was the taxpayer's agent for carrying on business in Puerto Rico with respect to the start-up period of the business. Given that there was no ambiguity in the agreement, it was not necessary to consider any extrinsic evidence of the parties' intention, and the fact that the Puerto Rican subsidiary represented in its tax returns to the Puerto Rican authorities that it was carrying on the business itself did not alter this conclusion.
Topics and taglines
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
339028
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Avotus Corp. v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2007 DTC 215, 2006 TCC 505",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Avotus Corp. v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2007 DTC 215, 2006 TCC 505",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}