"I find it extraordinary that the respondent Minister would contend, through counsel, that Eaton's, as a statutory agent, would have a higher obligation to its principal than as an agent under the usual principal and agent agreement. Eaton's, as a vendor, is obligated by statute to collect and remit the sales tax but, after exhausting all reasonable means to recompense itself, I can see no reason why it, as the agent, should bear the loss rather than its principal, the respondent Minister."
Topics and taglines
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
332454
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em><a name=\"TEaton\"></a>T. Eaton Co. v. Minister of Revenue</em></strong>, [1989] 1 CTC 269 (Ont CA)",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em><a name=\"TEaton\"></a>T. Eaton Co. v. Minister of Revenue</em></strong>, [1989] 1 CTC 269 (Ont CA)",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}