Daimsis v. The Queen, 2014 DTC 1118 [at at 3273], 2014 TCC 118 (Informal Procedure) -- summary under Evidence

By services, 28 November, 2015

Revenu Québec assessed the taxpayer under a cash-flow analysis, as her lifestyle exceeded her income, and she was not forthcoming with Revenu - she maintained that her estranged ex-fiancé paid her living expenses in the relevant period, but would not provide supporting documentation or even, initially, the fiancé's name.

After noting (at para. 20) that a cash flow analysis is a "method of last resort," Masse DJ found that the taxpayer was able to refute the Minister's assumptions, between her oral testimony and that of her ex, who was generally aggressively uncooperative.

Topics and taglines
Tagline
assumptions based on cash-flow analysis demolished by oral testimony
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
332682
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Daimsis v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2014 DTC 1118 [at 3273], 2014 TCC 118 (Informal Procedure) <strong>[assumptions based on cash-flow analysis demolished by oral testimony]</strong>",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}