Schroter v. The Queen, 2009 DTC 205, 2008 TCC 681 (Informal Procedure), aff'd respecting the first taxpayer sub nom. Schroter, 2010 DTC 5062, 2010 FCA 98 -- summary under Paragraph 6(1)(a)

By services, 28 November, 2015

The first taxpayer was found to have received a taxable benefit upon being given a parking pass because it was awarded on the basis of his promotion to "pay band 5", and his resulting ability now to work more overtime was primarily of benefit to him, with the benefits received by his employer being characterized as incidental. Although the quantum of the benefit was to be based on the cost-savings to him, this should not be based on the cost of public transit or the cost of parking in another lot because these alternatives would not have been satisfactory to the first taxpayer.

As to the second taxpayer, he gave evidence that his free parking pass was awarded to him primarily because he had applied for the parking pass to be used for business reasons. Accordingly, there was no benefit to him.

Topics and taglines
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
338395
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<a id=\"Johannsson\"></a><strong><em>Schroter and Johannsson v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2009 DTC 205, 2008 TCC 681 (Informal Procedure), aff'd respecting the first tax payer <em>sub nom. <a href=\"#Schroter\"><strong>Schroter</strong></em></a>, 2010 DTC 5062, 2010 FCA 98",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}