Woods J. found that the Crown was not estopped from applying s. 118.61(4) to reduce the taxpayer's unused tuition, textbook and education tax credits, even though relevant tax form (T1 schedule 11) had failed to include that subsection in its computations and even though it appeared that many taxpayers had, because of the error in the form, avoided having their credits reduced by operation of that subsection. Estoppel can bind the Crown on a misrepresentation of fact, but not of law (para. 15). Moreover, estoppel cannot preclude an exercise of statutory duty (para. 17). Woods J. dismissed the taxpayer's appeal but recommended he apply for discretionary relief.
Topics and taglines
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
333661
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Gallant v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2012 DTC 1140 [at 3233], 2012 TCC 119 (Informal Procedure)",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Gallant v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2012 DTC 1140 [at 3233], 2012 TCC 119 (Informal Procedure)",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}