Lussier v. The Queen, 2000 DTC 1677 (TCC) -- summary under Paragraph 150(1)(c)

By services, 28 November, 2015

In finding that a subsequently-filed letter request was a valid late designation under s. 104(13.1), Archambault J stated (at paras. 25, 26):

[A]lthough there is no general provision in the Act authorizing Canadian taxpayers to amend tax returns already filed, there is nothing to prevent them from doing so…[and] it is in the interest of tax administration to allow such amendments. …

…[T]he letter…was an amendment to the estate's tax return and its effect was to amend the initial return.

Topics and taglines
Tagline
late designation by letter was valid return amendment
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
334421
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Lussier v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2000 DTC 1677, Docket: 97-1928-IT-G (TCC) <strong>[late designation by letter was valid return amendment]</strong>",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}