In an obiter indication that ss.152(1.11) and (1.12), pursuant to which the Minister had made a retroactive redetermination of paid-up capital, should likely be interpreted restrictively, Boyle, J. stated (at para. 28) that "instinctively, it seems that retroactive determinations, like retroactive tax legislation, should be avoided except in cases where the legislator has clearly and unambiguously set out its intent to impose or permit the tax to be imposed retroactively."
Topics and taglines
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
340469
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Collins & Aikman Products Co. v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2009 DTC 1179 [at 958], 2009 TCC 299",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Collins & Aikman Products Co. v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2009 DTC 1179 [at 958], 2009 TCC 299",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}