Collins & Aikman Products Co. v. The Queen, 2009 DTC 1179 [at at 958], 2009 TCC 299, aff'd 2010 DTC 5164 [at 7293], 2010 FCA 251 -- summary under Payment & Receipt

By services, 28 November, 2015

A Canadian corporation ("C&A") paid two dividends to its Canadian-resident parent ("Holdings"), which distributed the same amounts to its U.S.-resident parent ("Products") as distributions of paid-up capital. Boyle J. noted (at para. 21) that there was no dispute that a distribution of stated capital by a Canadian corporation, that did not have a bank account, to its non-resident shareholder had been paid by it through directions in respect of a dividend payable to it by its subsidiary:

Since Holdings did not have a bank account, in each case the amount of Holdings' return of capital to Products was distributed electronically from C&A's bank account directly to Products' bank account. There was no dispute that C&A was acting as Holdings' agent in this regard with satisfactory directions and financial reporting.

Note
aff'd on other grounds 2010 DTC 5164 [at 7293], 2010 FCA 251
Topics and taglines
Tagline
payment by direction
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
333006
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Collins &amp; Aikman Products Co. v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2009 DTC 1179 [at 958], 2009 TCC 299, aff'd on other grounds 2010 DTC 5164 [at 7293], 2010 FCA 251 <strong>[payment by direction]</strong>",
"field_override_history": true,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}