Symes v. Canada, 94 DTC 6001, [1993] 4 S.C.R. 695, [1994] 1 CTC 40 -- summary under Subsection 63(1)

By services, 28 November, 2015

Because the purpose for which the taxpayer incurred her child care expenses came squarely within the definition of "child care expenses" in s. 63(3), she was precluded from deducting such expenses in accordance with the more general rules governing deductibility in ss.9 and 18(1)(a).

Topics and taglines
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
338529
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Symes v. The Queen</em></strong>, 94 DTC 6001, [1993] 4 SCR 695",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": ""
}