Hogan J. found at para. 22 that, even if a collection of insects were the taxpayers' personal use property, they did not form an "unbreakable set," and therefore s. 46(3) did not apply to consolidate them into a single personal-use property. He found instead that each insect was a separate property. The taxpayers therefore had a deemed adjusted cost base of $1000 per insect as per s. 46(1)(a), and did not realize a capital gain when they donated the collection to to Laval University.
Topics and taglines
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
338004
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Plamondon v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2011 DTC 1137 [at 746], 2011 TCC 47 (Informal Procedure)",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Plamondon v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2011 DTC 1137 [at 746], 2011 TCC 47 (Informal Procedure)",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}