A business of producing and selling maple syrup through directors who were remunerated for their efforts was not a related business. An argument that the maple syrup business should be regarded as a related business because the profit generated was deposited in an account for use at some future time to construct a community centre, was rejected.
Topics and taglines
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
334308
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>House of Holy God v. Attorney General of Canada</em></strong>, 2009 DTC 5901, 2009 FCA 148",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": ""
}
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>House of Holy God v. Attorney General of Canada</em></strong>, 2009 DTC 5901, 2009 FCA 148",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": ""
}