Nicholls v. The Queen, 2011 DTC 1295 [at at 1666], 2011 TCC 39 -- summary under Paragraph 67.1(2)(a)

By services, 28 November, 2015

The taxpayer carried on a business of providing information technology training courses, many of which were provided at a hotel where breakfast and lunch were provided to participants. The course fee did not itemize a charge for these meals. These catering expenses were deductible under s. 67.1(2)(a). It was irrelevant whether the provision of the meals was a minor or significant part of the ordinary course of business of the taxpayer's business - Webb J. noted (at para. 10) that, for example, airlines were allowed to deduct passenger meal expenses under IT-518R (para. 9). Webb J. also stated (at para. 13):

Not identifying [on the invoices] each item that is provided as part of a package does not mean that any particular item is not being provided for compensation.

Topics and taglines
Tagline
meals can be minor component and non-itemized
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
338579
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em><a id=\"PinkElephant\"></a>Pink Elephant Inc. v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2011 DTC 1295 [at 1666], 2011 TCC 39 (Informal Procedure) <strong>[meals can be minor component and non-itemized]</strong>",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}