Canada v. Lehigh Cement Limited, 2014 DTC 5058 [at at 6849], 2014 FCA 103, aff'g 2013 DTC 1139 [at 740], 2013 TCC 176 -- summary under Headings

By services, 28 November, 2015

Stratas JA was assisted in his conclusions that s. 95(6)(b) was not intended to deal with generalized tax avoidance by its location in the Act, stating (at para. 54):

Another contextual factor is the architecture of the Act. Paragraph 95(6)(b) appears in subdivision i ("Shareholders of Corporations Not Resident in Canada") of Division B ("Computation of Income") of Part I of the Act. When paragraph 95(6)(b) is triggered, it affects whether a particular share acquisition or disposition should be considered when computing income. It is not in a more general part of the Act such as Part XVI ("Tax Avoidance"). In the absence of specific wording suggesting otherwise, this supports the conclusion that paragraph 95(6)(b) addresses concerns about acquisitions or dispositions of "shares of corporations not resident in Canada," not other transactions or more general tax avoidance concerns.

Topics and taglines
Tagline
provision not in Tax Avoidance Part of Act
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
340112
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Lehigh Cement Ltd. v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2014 DTC 5058 [at 6849], 2014 FCA 103 <strong>[provision not in Tax Avoidance Part of Act]</strong>",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": ""
}