The Minister issued a demand under s. 231.2 to the respondent requiring the provision of a statement of dispersements in regards to a real estate sale transaction and a copy of the cheque for the proceeds. In finding that this information was not protected by solicitor-client privilege, Shaw J. stated (at p. 6180) that the documents were "evidence of an 'act or transactions', not of a 'communication' that attracts solicitor-client privilege ...".
Topics and taglines
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
336779
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>MNR v. Reddy</em></strong>, 2006 DTC 6178, 2006 FC 277",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": ""
}
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>MNR v. Reddy</em></strong>, 2006 DTC 6178, 2006 FC 277",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": ""
}