Pursuant to a court order, the taxpayer paid his former spouse one half of any bonuses he received from employment. Bédard J found that such amounts were not "periodic" for the purposes of the "support amount" definition, given that, although a non-payment was unlikely, there was no guarantee that bonuses would be paid every year.
Topics and taglines
Tagline
share of bonuses
Words and phrases
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
338319
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em><a name=\"Berty\"></a>Berty v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2013 DTC 1171 [at 935], 2013 TCC 202 (Informal Procedure) <strong>[share of bonuses]</strong>",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em><a name=\"Berty\"></a>Berty v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2013 DTC 1171 [at 935], 2013 TCC 202 (Informal Procedure) <strong>[share of bonuses]</strong>",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}