Kelso Patry v. The Queen, 2013 DTC 1142 [at at 757], 2013 TCC 107 (Informal Procedure) -- summary under Legal and other Professional Fees

By services, 28 November, 2015

The taxpayer, a physician, sought retribution against an arbitrator who had ruled against her in a medical dispute. The arbitrator successfully sued the taxpayer for what amounted to a "vendetta" to sabotage his professional standing and have him criminally prosecuted, and he was awarded punitive damages.

Hogan J found that the taxpayer's legal fees incurred in the arbitrator's suit were not a business expense, as there was no connection between the relevant legal expenses and the business. He noted in particular that the expenses could not have been incurred to enable the taxpayer to continue her professional practice, given that her practice had continued even though the arbitrator's suit could not have turned out worse for her (para. 37).

Topics and taglines
Tagline
no connection with medical practice
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
335325
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Patry v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2013 DTC 1142 [at 757], 2013 TCC 107 (Informal Procedure) <strong>[no connection with medical practice]</strong>",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}