Poirier v. The Queen, 2011 DTC 1346 [at at 1937], 2011 TCC 311 -- summary under Subsection 60.1(1)

By services, 28 November, 2015

When the taxpayer separated from his wife, he continued making payments to third parties related to the matrimonial home. Jorré J. found that the payments were not deductible under s. 60.1(1) because they were not made pursuant to a written agreement, and so did not meet the definition of "support amount" in s. 56.1(4). He also noted that the "support amount" definition requires that, for payments to qualify as support amounts under s. 60.1(1), the agreement must provide that ss. 60.1(2) and 56.1(2) shall apply. He stated (at para. 34):

[I]t must be clear from the agreement that the parties intention is that the payer will be able to deduct the amounts in his income tax returns and that the recipient must include them. It is not necessary for the agreement to refer to ITA provisions.

Topics and taglines
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
338505
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Poirier v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2011 DTC 1346 [at 1937], 2011 TCC 311",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}