A demand to the respondent bank to disclose the name, address and telephone number of an account holder to whose account a tax debtor had deposited a cheque was not valid as there was no judicial authorization pursuant to s. 231.2(2). Décary J.A. described the purposes of s. 231.2(2).
Topics and taglines
Tagline
requirement to get judicial authorization first for named individual
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
336682
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>MNR v. Toronto Dominion Bank</em></strong>, 2005 DTC 5140, 2004 FCA 359",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": ""
}
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>MNR v. Toronto Dominion Bank</em></strong>, 2005 DTC 5140, 2004 FCA 359",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": ""
}