The taxpayer and Humbly Enterprises were related corporations. When Humbly was experiencing financial difficulties and was in arrears for source deduction remittances, the taxpayer commenced paying the remuneration of Humbly's employees and took on their services. It was only at that point, Boyle J. found, that the individuals in question became employees of the taxpayer. Therefore, the taxpayer could not be liable for Humbly's source deduction arrears - Boyle J. characterized CRA's contrary position as "inappropriate retroactive collection planning." Absent a sham, the CRA has no right to redetermine a legal employment relationship.
Topics and taglines
Tagline
no responsibility for source deduction arreas when took on payment responsibility
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
334663
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Central Springs Limited v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2010 DTC 1258 [at 4409], 2010 TCC 543 (Informal Procedure)",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Central Springs Limited v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2010 DTC 1258 [at 4409], 2010 TCC 543 (Informal Procedure)",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}