The appellant leased a transit system to another municipal transit entity for rent of $1 per year, but with the lessee being obligated to pay municipal taxes imposed on the leased premises (which amounted to around $2 million per year). C Miller J noted that this obligation represented non-nominal consideration for the lease. See summary under s. 141.01(1.1).
Topics and taglines
Tagline
lease consideration not nominal because of property tax obligation
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
332144
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>British Columbia Transit v. The Queen</em></strong>, [2006] GSTC 103, 2006 TCC 437 <strong>[lease consideration not nominal because of property tax obligation]</strong>",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>British Columbia Transit v. The Queen</em></strong>, [2006] GSTC 103, 2006 TCC 437 <strong>[lease consideration not nominal because of property tax obligation]</strong>",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}