The taxpayer entered into a joint venture agreement with a developer for the development of a shopping centre because it wished to build a store at the shopping centre, which it expected to be profitable, and it wished to prevent a competitor from building on or near the site. Beaubier J. found that the taxpayer acquired its interest in the joint venture as an adventure in nature of trade, so that a gain ultimately realized by it when it sold its interest in the joint venture was on income account, in light of a clause in the joint venture agreement which provided that the taxpayer had a right to sell its co-ownership interest to the developer at a profit of $2 million upon rezoning being achieved. It did not do so, because it projected realizing a greater profit upon sale to a third party.
Topics and taglines
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
339278
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<a id=\"Safeway\"></a><strong><em>Canada Safeway Ltd. v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2006 DTC 3144, 2006 TCC 345",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}
"field_legacy_header": "<a id=\"Safeway\"></a><strong><em>Canada Safeway Ltd. v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2006 DTC 3144, 2006 TCC 345",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}