The taxpayer argued that s. 118(5), which denied his access to a s. 118(1) child tax credits because he paid court-ordered support amounts, was a violation of his s. 15(1) Charter rights. VA Miller J pointed out that the obligation to pay child support is not an analogous ground of discrimination. Moreover, the obligation to pay child support came about because of his personal income, which is also not an analogous ground (para. 15).
Topics and taglines
Tagline
obligation to pay child support is not an analogous ground
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
331898
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>D'Ambrosio v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2014 DTC 1090 [at 3154], 2014 TCC 70 (Informal Procedure) <strong>[obligation to pay child support is not an analogous ground]</strong>",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>D'Ambrosio v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2014 DTC 1090 [at 3154], 2014 TCC 70 (Informal Procedure) <strong>[obligation to pay child support is not an analogous ground]</strong>",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}