Cadillac Fairview Corp. v. R., 99 DTC 5121, [1999] 3 CTC 353 (FCA) -- summary under Subparagraph 40(2)(g)(ii)

By services, 28 November, 2015

The taxpayer was unable to recognize a capital loss in respect of its guarantees of bank loans made to real estate partnerships in which fifth-tier U.S. subsidiaries were invested given that, in one case, it did not make the payments in question pursuant to its guarantee of the partnership's debts (but, instead, as a contribution of capital to the relevant fifth-tier subsidiary in order for that subsidiary to repay a portion of the guaranteed debt owing by the relevant partnership) and, in the other cases, it received valuable consideration for its waiver of rights to become subrogated as a result of making payments pursuant to its guarantees, namely, the agreement of a third party to purchase the subsidiaries in question. The analysis of McDonald J.A. indicated (at p. 5126) that the taxpayer would have been considered to have disposed of subrogated debts acquired by virtue of making payments pursuant to its guarantee notwithstanding its agreement, in advance, to waive its claims of subrogation, given that "waiver 'presupposes the existence of a right to be relinquished'".

Topics and taglines
Tagline
payments not made only pursuant to guarantee
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
337956
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Cadillac Fairview Corp. Ltd. v. The Queen</em></strong>, 99 DTC 5121, Docket: A-282-96 (FCA) <strong>[payments not made only pursuant to guarantee]</strong>",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": ""
}
Workflow properties
Workflow state