Canada v. Telus Communications (Edmonton) Inc., 2005 FCA 159 -- summary under Subsection 169(2.1)

By services, 28 November, 2015

The taxpayer was a specified person and raised in its Notice of Appeal in the Tax Court of Canada the issue of due diligence with respect to automatic penalties under the ETA upon being assessed for additional net tax. In Telus' appeal before the Tax Court, the Crown moved to strike the amendments to the Notice of Appeal originally filed which added the issue of the due diligence defence to the penalties.

In finding for the Crown, Desjardins JA stated (at para. 21):

[T]he issue of due diligence was never raised in any notice of objection. The respondent's request to vacate "associated interest and penalties", which was mentioned only in its notice of objection to the reassessment, was not a reference to the issue of due diligence but was consequential to the reduction of interest and penalty flowing from the requested reduction of the net tax adjustments. The respondent cannot therefore raise due diligence in its amended notice of appeal before the Tax Court.

Topics and taglines
Tagline
due diligence defence not raised
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
335041
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Telus Communications (Edmonton) Inc. v. Canada</em></strong>, 2005 FCA 159 <strong>[due diligence defence not raised]</strong>",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}