Although Burger King restaurant were used for "processing" (given that the ordinary meaning of that word did not exclude the preparation of food), the taxpayer was unable to adduce sufficient evidence of qualitative factors that would detract from a conclusion that the buildings of the taxpayer's fast food chain were not used "primarily" for processing given that approximately 46.5% of the space was used for processing.
Topics and taglines
Words and phrases
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
334004
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em><a name=\"BurgerKing\"></a>Burger King Restaurants of Canada Inc. v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2000 DTC 6061, Docket: A-886-96 (FCA)",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": ""
}
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em><a name=\"BurgerKing\"></a>Burger King Restaurants of Canada Inc. v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2000 DTC 6061, Docket: A-886-96 (FCA)",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": ""
}