Franck v. The Queen, 2011 DTC 1142 [at at 768], 2011 TCC 179 (Informal Procedure) -- summary under Subsection 163(1)

By services, 28 November, 2015

The taxpayer, a chef with a high school diploma, failed to include in his return the T4 slip from one of his four employment sources. Hogan J. found that the taxpayer had a due diligence defence, given his inexperience in the workplace, and given that H&R Block, who he hired to assist in his return, had not advised him to seek the missing T4 slip.

Hogan J. reviewed several s. 163(1) due diligence cases and noted (at para. 9) that the key distinguishing factor is the taxpayer's familiarity with the tax system; the less the taxpayer's experience, and the more complex the income scenario, the stronger the defence.

Note
see also Paquette v. The Queen, 2011 DTC 1208 [at 1225], 2011 TCC 208 (Informal Procedure)]
Topics and taglines
Tagline
diligent - unsophisticated taxpayer and complex situation
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
334789
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Franck v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2011 DTC 1142 [at 768], 2011 TCC 179 (Informal Procedure) [see also <em>Paquette v. The Queen</em>, 2011 DTC 1208 [at 1225], 2011 TCC 208 (Informal Procedure)] <strong>[diligent - unsophisticated taxpayer and complex situation]</strong>",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}