Slobodrian v. Canada (Minister of National Revenue), 2003 DTC 5632, 2003 FCA 350 -- summary under Property

By services, 28 November, 2015

Before going on to find that a "gift" of services did not qualify as a gift of property, Noël J.A. stated (at p. 5634) that in Manrell, the Court had found that "the statutory definition in subsection 248(1) does not expand the word property beyond its normal meaning" (p. 5634).

Topics and taglines
Tagline
statutory definition of "property" is not broader than its ordinary meaning
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
337313
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Slobodrian v. MNR</em></strong>, 2003 DTC 5632, 2003 FCA 350",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": ""
}