Ensite Ltd. v. R., 86 DTC 6521, [1986] 2 CTC 459, [1986] 2 SCR 509 -- summary under Subsection 129(4.1)

By services, 28 November, 2015

The taxpayer made U.S. dollar deposits with commercial banks in order to reduce its net borrowing cost under a swap arrangement respecting an investment by the taxpayer in a stamping plant in the Philippines. The swap arrangement in turn resulted from a requirement under Philippines law that it bring foreign currency into the Philippines to finance the stamping plant.

The U.S. dollar deposits were held to be "property used or held by the corporation in the year in the course of carrying on a business" for purposes of the Canadian investment income definition s. 129(4). Wilson J stated:

[T]he test is whether the property was used to fulfill a requirement which had to be met in order to do business. Such property is then truly employed and risked in the business. Here the property was used to fulfill a mandatory condition precedent to trade.

Topics and taglines
Tagline
deposits met a requirement of the business and thus were used in the business
Words and phrases
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
334041
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Ensite Ltd. v. The Queen</em></strong>, 86 DTC 6521, [1986] 2 CTC 459, [1986] 2 SCR 509",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": ""
}
Workflow properties
Workflow state