The taxpayer was the chief executive officer of a corporation that sold its business to another corporation. In finding that a lump sum received by the taxpayer from the corporation qualified as a retiring allowance notwithstanding that he became an employee of the purchaser, Hamlyn TCJ. noted that the taxpayer was not a shareholder, director, or officer of the purchaser and that he performed clerical functions rather than executive functions at his new employer.
Topics and taglines
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
337356
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Fostey v. The Queen</em></strong>, 99 DTC 1004, Docket: 97-3398-IT-G (TCC)",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Fostey v. The Queen</em></strong>, 99 DTC 1004, Docket: 97-3398-IT-G (TCC)",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}