Wallace v. Canada, 98 DTC 6326 (FCA)

By services, 28 November, 2015
Is tax content
Tax Content (confirmed)
Citation
Citation name
98 DTC 6326
Decision date
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
352374
Extra import data
{
"field_court_parentheses": "FCA",
"field_external_guid": [
"url::decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca/fca-caf/decisions/en/item/32561/index"
],
"field_full_style_of_cause": "",
"field_import_body_hash": "6ac8df504ddb489c835b4423bc8be873020730c0b3599bf92fa9dec67069a3dc",
"field_informal_procedure": false,
"field_year_parentheses": "",
"field_source_url": {
"url": "https://decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca/fca-caf/decisions/en/item/32561/index.do",
"title": "",
"attributes": [],
"original_title": "",
"original_url": "https://decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca/fca-caf/decisions/en/item/32561/index.do"
}
}
Style of cause
Wallace v. Canada
Main text

Date: 19980402


Docket: A-327-96

CORAM: STRAYER, J.A.

DESJARDINS, J.A.

HENRY, D.J.

BETWEEN:

KEITH E. WALLACE

Applicant

- and -

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

(Judgment Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario

on Thursday April, 2, 1998)

DESJARDINS, J.A.:

[1] We are all of the view that this application for judicial review must fail.

[2] The applicant became indebted to a company of which he was the sole shareholder on February 2, 1990, when the bank called in a guarantee undertaken by the company for a loan that had been made by the bank to the applicant personally. Pursuant to paragraph 15(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act, the amount of the indebtedness was to be included in computing the income of the applicant for the year 1990, unless the indebtedness was repaid within the year after the end of the taxation year of the company.

[3] But this did not happen. As found by the Tax Court Judge, the applicant was not able to make repayment at all and the debt was written off by the company as uncollectible.

[4] We are of the view that a write-off is not equivalent to a repayment, as claimed by the applicant, and that the Tax Court Judge properly directed himself in the law.

[5] This application for judicial review will therefore be dismissed.

"A. Desjardins"

J.A.

FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA


Date: 19980402


Docket: A-327-96

BETWEEN:

KEITH E. WALLACE

Applicant

- and -

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

Names of Counsel and Solicitors of Record

DOCKET: A-327-96

STYLE OF CAUSE: KEITH E. WALLACE

- and -

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

DATE OF HEARING: APRIL 2, 1998

PLACE OF HEARING: TORONTO, ONTARIO

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: DESJARDINS, J.A.

DATED: APRIL 2, 1998

Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario

on Thursday April 2, 1998

APPEARANCES: Mr. John J. Vujicic

For the Applicant

Mr. Marilyn Vardy

For the Respondent

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:          Mr. John J. Vujicic

Barrister and Solicitor

Suite 1420

135 James Street South

Hamilton, Ontario

L8P 2Z6

For the Applicant

George Thomson

Deputy Attorney General

of Canada

For the Respondent


Docket
A-327-96