Since Winnipeg was the residence of the taxpayer's employer, the taxpayer's residence, the place where he performed his work and where he was paid, the fact that the nature of the work related to assisting reserve Indians when they moved off the reserve was not sufficient to establish exemption.
Topics and taglines
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
333241
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Desnomie v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2000 DTC 6250, Docket: A-533-98 (FCA)",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": ""
}
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Desnomie v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2000 DTC 6250, Docket: A-533-98 (FCA)",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": ""
}