The taxpayer, who lived and worked in the United States for ten months in 2001 (throughout which period his wife continued to live in the family home in Mississauga) as a result of accepting a position which he believed to be of indefinite duration, but returned to Canada after ten months when the job ended unexpectedly. The trial judge had not committed a reviewable error in finding that the centre of vital interests of the taxpayer under the tie-breaker rule in the Canada-U.S. Income Tax Convention remained in Canada.
Topics and taglines
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
340629
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Bujnowski v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2006 DTC 6071, 2006 FCA 32",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": ""
}
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Bujnowski v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2006 DTC 6071, 2006 FCA 32",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": ""
}