The taxpayer, a lawyer, who acquired approximately 1 1/2 mortgages per year at a discount out of his personal savings and who made the acquisitions only after he concluded they were safe investments, realized a $700 discount on the mortgage in question for $7,100 as an accretion to capital rather than in connection with an adventure in the nature of trade. (The Crown had abandoned its contention that the amounts were interest.) Abbott J noted (in addition to the infrequency of the transactions) that income from stocks and bonds "was a relatively modest part of [the taxpayer's] gross income," his "purchases were not speculative and...made after he had inspected each property and reached a decision that each mortgage was a safe investment," and that "this pattern of appellant's activities was consistent with the making of personal investments out of his savings and not with the carrying on of a business" (pp. 5074-5).
Topics and taglines
Tagline
infrequent acquisitions of mortgages at a discount occurred as a sideline personal investing activity
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
339114
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em><a name=\"Wood\"></a>Wood v. MNR</em></strong>, 69 DTC 5073, [1969] S.C.R. 330",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": ""
}
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em><a name=\"Wood\"></a>Wood v. MNR</em></strong>, 69 DTC 5073, [1969] S.C.R. 330",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": ""
}
Workflow properties
Workflow state