Newton v. Commissioner of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia, [1958] A.C. 450 (PC) -- summary under Securities Lending Arrangement

By services, 28 November, 2015

Before finding that dividend stripping transactions were void for taxation purposes by virtue of s. 260 of the Commonwealth Income Tax and Social Services Contribution Assessment Act, 1936-1951 (Australia) Lord Denning stated (p. 465):

"Their Lordships are of opinion that the word 'arrangement' is apt to describe something less than a binding contract or agreement, something in the nature of an understanding between two or more persons - a plan arranged between them which may not be enforceable at law. But it must in this section comprehend, not only the initial plan but also all the transactions by which it is carried into effect - all the transactions, that is, which have the effect of avoiding taxation, be they conveyances, transfers or anything else."

Topics and taglines
Words and phrases
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
337676
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em><a id=\"Newton\"></a>Newton v. Commissioner of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia</em></strong>, [1958] A.C. 450 (PC) <strong>[\"arrangement\"]</strong>",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}