Firestone Tyre & Rubber Co. Ltd. v. Lewellin (1957), 37 TC 111 (HL) -- summary under Paragraph 2(3)(b)

By dwpv, 28 November, 2015

tThe taxpayer ("Brentford"), which was a U.K. subsidiary of a U.S. corporation ("Akron") manufactured tires for sale, as agent for Akron, to distributors of Akron located in various countries including Sweden. In affirming a finding that the profits from the sales constituted income of Akron from a "trade exercised within the United Kingdom" notwithstanding that master distributorship agreements between Akron and the distributors were made outside the U.K., Lord Radcliffe stated (p. 143):

The sales to look at ... were the dealings which took place in the course of trade between Brentford and the Swedish distributor, and those dealings consisted of invitations to trade received by Brentford in England, the manufacture or appropriation of stock in England in response to those invitations, the delivery of the stock free alongside vessel in England in discharge of the order, and the receipt of the payment in a bank in England. These operations constituted the exercising of a trade in England.

Topics and taglines
Tagline
manufacturing trade exercised in UK notwithstanding place of distributorship contracts
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
335953
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Firestone Tyre &amp; Rubber Co. Ltd. v. Lewellin</em></strong> (1957), 37 TC 111 (HL) <strong>[manufacturing trade exercised in UK notwithstanding place of distributorship contracts]</strong>",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}