Canada v. Robinson, 98 DTC 6232 (FCA) -- summary under Incurring of Expense

By services, 28 November, 2015

A medical partnership comprised of 18 doctors leased its medical premises from a nominee corporation holding for a co-ownership of the doctors. The co-ownership paid a tenant inducement payment to the partnership, which it treated as a capital receipt but which was deducted by the co-owners on a pro rata basis over a period of 10 years . In finding that these payments were non-deductible, Robertson JA stated (at pp. 6235-6236):

In support of the proposition that a payment to oneself cannot give rise to a tax deduction, the Minister could have also relied on the common law rule against contracting with one's self. …

[T]he fact is that the same eighteen persons who formed the Partnership were the very same persons who comprised the Co-Tenancy. … [T]he agreement to pay the tenant inducement payment of $1.2 million was of no legal consequence and.. it cannot be considered an outlay or expense made for the purpose of gaining or producing income… .

Topics and taglines
Tagline
payments made from co-owners to partnership of same individuals were non-deductible payments to themselves
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
335250
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>The Queen v. Robinson</em></strong>, 98 DTC 6232, <a href=\"http://decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca/fca-caf/decisions/en/item/31600/index.do\">Docket: A-8-96</a> (FCA) <strong>[payments made from co-owners to partnership of same individuals were non-deductible]</strong>",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": ""
}
Workflow properties
Workflow state