The taxpayer, who owned one-third of the shares of a corporation that paid a dividend to its shareholders, and was a director and bookkeeper of the corporation, was found not be acting in concert with the other two directors (who were the remaining shareholders) when the directors with her assent declared and paid a dividend given that the other two directors largely ignored her when they were not in conflict with her. Accordingly, there was no common mind amongst the three directors. S.160(1) did not apply to the payment of the dividend to the taxpayer.
Topics and taglines
d7 import status
Drupal 7 entity type
Node
Drupal 7 entity ID
334724
Extra import data
{
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Siracusa v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2003 DTC 2106, 2003 TCC 941",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}
"field_legacy_header": "<strong><em>Siracusa v. The Queen</em></strong>, 2003 DTC 2106, 2003 TCC 941",
"field_override_history": false,
"field_sid": "",
"field_topic_category": "seealso"
}